|
Wilton, Andrew and Tim Barringer. American Sublime: Landscape
Painting in the United States, 1820-1880 [Exhibition Catalogue].
New York: Princeton University Press, 2002.
There are no doubt those—and by those
I mean those who clothe themselves in the guilt-ridden cynicism
of the postmodern academic stance—who would view the very
concept of an American Sublime as oxymoronic. It is fair to
say that for many non-Americanists, American landscape paintings
of the nineteenth century, for all of their moments of brilliance,
are relegated to that portion of the mind piled high with butter
churns, bedwarmers and dust-covered cuspidors: moribund sentimentalities
from less socially enlightened times. An extraordinary exhibition
and accompanying catalogue, American Sublime: Landscape
Painting in the United States, 1820-1880, offers contrary
and abundant evidence that the wilderness of North and South
America indeed stirred its artists to that state of mind described
by Edmund Burke and Immanuel Kant (whether you believe that
Nature itself is sublime or whether the sublime is a mental
sensation induced by Nature is still up for grabs).
Organized by the Tate Britain, London (eventually
the show ventured to the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts and
The Minneapolis Institute of Art), "American Sublime"
assembled some one hundred works by the usual suspects (names
familiar to Americans, but generally not to the British): Thomas
Cole, Asher B. Durand, Jasper Francis Cropsey, Frederic Edwin
Church, John Frederick Kensett, Sanford Robinson Gifford, Martin
Johnson Heade, Fitz Hugh Lane, Albert Bierstadt, and Thomas
Moran. Accompanying the detailed catalogue entries are two short
essays by Andrew Wilton (“The Sublime in the Old World
and the New”) and Tim Barringer (“The Course of
Empires: Landscape in America and Britain, 1820-1880). Brief
but useful biographies of these and other artists are also provided,
compiled by Graham C. Boettcher.
Wilton’s starting point in “The
Sublime of the Old World and the New,” naturally, is a
discussion of Edmund Burke’s concept of the sublime as
understood by nineteenth-century Americans who found themselves
face-to-face with unspoiled Nature in all its splendor, such
as Lieutenant William Clark (of Lewis and Clark fame). A distinct
variety of the sublime—that of reverential awe rather
than the loneliness or angst often associated with works by
Caspar David Friedrich or Carl Carus—is, as the book points
out, more in line with British sensibilities. Far from sentimental,
however, the works in American Sublime explore that
reverence in often exhilarating ways.
In his assessment of the sublime, Wilton deftly
details the transformation of priorities from history painting
to landscape; J.M.W. Turner, in insisting that his large canvases
be hung low so as to bring the viewer more directly into his
tempests and snowstorms, serves as a crucial precursor to the
American sublime (an interesting accompanying exhibit at the
PAFA related the work of Turner to that institution). Oft-heard
terms such as Hudson River School (a geographically constrictive
term coined, according to painter Worthington Whittredge, by
a derisive critic) and Luminism (never a unified movement) are
questioned as to their usefulness. Nor, he points out, were
those touted as Luminists—as far as can be discerned—ever
true adherents of the transcendental movement. As Wilton points
out, however, they shared with Emerson a sense that it is the
“city-dweller” who will come to understand and appreciate
the sublime aspects of Nature—that the ascent from rural
denizen to urban sophisticate ushers in the ability to comprehend
the enormity of the truths being revealed.
Technique is given primacy over labels. Wilton
maintains that much of American landscape painting is characterized
by a “pragmatic building up of the picture surface touch
by touch which varies greatly in effect from painter to painter,
but which rarely obtrudes itself as a distinctly painterly ‘style,’”
which often “strikes unaccustomed eyes as dry and academic.”
He admits, however, that American painters are comparable to
European academic painters of the period and that regardless
of a lack of “eloquent brio,” painters such as Cole
and Church created powerful statements in search of the sublime.
It was this ongoing quest for sublime experience that led these
artists to the Catskills, Ecuador, and the American West. The
interest in “wilderness”—wherever found—unites
these artists, who sought their inspiration far from an urban
existence ever growing in complexity and industrialization.
Tim Barringer, in “The Course of Empires:
Landscape in America and Britain, 1820-1880,” further
discusses the development of American landscape painting in
Jacksonian America in terms of a parallel rise in the genre
in Britain. Several of the artists in question, of course, were
born in Britain—Joshua Shaw, Thomas Cole and Thomas Moran.
Barringer makes the argument that Cole’s Course of
Empire is not, as generally thought, an allegory of Jacksonian
America’s imperial aspirations (as Alan Wallach has argued),
but of Britain’s (that would certainly help explain the
presence of a Stonehenge-like cromlech in the second work in
the series, The Arcadian State). It has been suggested
that Cole devised the series after a particularly unpleasant
stay in England in 1829.
The catalogue itself (as well as the exhibition
at PAFA) moves thematically—almost in the tradition of
Cole’s serial paintings. From categories ranging from
“Wilderness” and “The Course of Empire”
to “Explorations” and “The Great West,”
American Sublime sets out to move beyond the concepts
of Hudson River School and Luminism to redefine American landscape
painting in terms of themes inherent to these artists, who all
sought the sublime in various ways. Especially valuable is the
catalogue’s exploration of how the notion of the sublime
developed from British-inspired landscapes to inherently American
views, such as Moran’s Grand Canyon of the Colorado
(1892).
An interesting and debatably meaningful connection
is missed, however—Edmund Burke, as well as Lewis and
Clark, Thomas Cole and Albert Bierstadt, belonged to the Masonic
fraternity. As holders of the “Sublime Degree of Master
Mason” (the highest of the three degrees), they would
have undergone the initiations and teachings of the Craft of
Freemasonry—infused with Enlightenment ideals—that
are designed to instill in the initiate a sense of wonder and
awe with Nature. The term “sublime” began to be
used in conjunction with Masonry at the beginning of the nineteenth
century. The second degree, “Fellowcraft,” is particularly
designed to foster the study and admiration of science and Nature.
This is not to suggest that their experiences as artists were
wholly shaped by their training as Freemasons, for as De Witt
Clinton, himself a Grand Master of the Masons in the State of
New York, noted:
…the cultivation of science, the embellishments
of taste, and the sublime and beautiful work of art, have
certainly existed in ancient, as they now do in modern times,
without the agency of Freemasonry.
Nevertheless, the fraternity certainly promoted
the study of the natural world, in terms not unlike those of
other descriptions of the sublime. In its description of the
charges of the Fellowcraft degree, Cornelius Moore’s The
Craftsman and Freemason’s Guide (1859) suggests that:
…and intimate acquaintance with the
great book of nature will show you the wisdom, power and beneficence
of the Creator; it will teach you lessons of humility, fervency,
faith and charity, and fit you to play your part in the drama
of human life, with honor to yourself, and with credit to
the fraternity.
The trouble with—and strength of—the
American wilderness was that it was free of “associations”
with European culture and history; imagination was required
of American artists to translate their perceptions into spiritually
meaningful paintings. One could venture to say that America
created its own interpretation of the sublime, different than
its European counterparts; basing their perceptions on geological
insights and spiritual awakenings in the midst of pure wilderness,
these artists—as American Sublime so powerfully
reveals—nevertheless sought to invoke a sense of awe without
the angst.
Author's
Bio>>
|